tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4706138697725258507.post111570021935314001..comments2023-11-03T13:59:49.246+01:00Comments on The IMS Lantern: Review of Typical SCIM FeaturesUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4706138697725258507.post-22595550899663519182012-08-31T06:48:15.701+02:002012-08-31T06:48:15.701+02:00I absolutely tie in with anything you've prese...I absolutely tie in with anything you've presented us.Delphiahttp://www.cherokeecounty-nc.gov/redirect.aspx?url=http://www.theexilesclan.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4706138697725258507.post-1936824868866180172007-12-10T16:36:00.000+01:002007-12-10T16:36:00.000+01:00Hi,I wrote about the Service Broker and what I thi...Hi,<BR/><BR/>I wrote about the Service Broker and what I think about it in another post:<BR/>http://theimslantern.blogspot.com/2007/05/standardization-scim-service-broker.html<BR/><BR/>Basically, I think that the service broker is not what is really required as a SCIM.<BR/><BR/>The SB serves some purposes I think are not relevant, or qt leqst are not central for the success of IMS as something else than a new traditional telco network over IP.<BR/><BR/>Obviously this is a subjective opinion I have, but all my arguments are on the table for anyone to make its own opinion.<BR/><BR/>ChristopheChristophe Gourraudhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02470245318821694389noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4706138697725258507.post-72085380063999762782007-10-24T09:35:00.000+02:002007-10-24T09:35:00.000+02:00Hello Christophe,In my opinion this is one of the ...Hello Christophe,<BR/>In my opinion this is one of the best analisys of the requisites of SCIM. Unfortunately, the standarization of that issue in 3GPP isn't go as fast as we want, so we'll have to wait in order to figure out how all this will finish. By the time, we have to resign ourselves and continue with our predictions. I only have one question, What is, in your opinion, the difference between SCIM and Service Broker (see TR 23.810)?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4706138697725258507.post-18301002781977218592007-05-11T19:55:00.000+02:002007-05-11T19:55:00.000+02:00Hi Simon,Thanks for the compliment. If you read my...Hi Simon,<BR/>Thanks for the compliment. <BR/>If you read my post carefully, I can see some potential use cases for IMS and IN interactions (when IMS is used to extend circuit-switched telephony to IP). However, I do not see a strong use case for implementing new IN services specific to IMS. And I do not think that interacting with IN requires the specification of a SCIM.<BR/>ChristopheChristophe Gourraudhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02470245318821694389noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4706138697725258507.post-74196372679909920772007-05-11T18:26:00.000+02:002007-05-11T18:26:00.000+02:00excellent thoughts Cristophe, though the realities...excellent thoughts Cristophe, though the realities of many an operator can force actions that are less than ideal; IN will continue for a while yet, so IN and IMS interaction is necessary for some, for example.grouchybabeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01697654112506353269noreply@blogger.com